Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Collaboration. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Collaboration. Mostrar todas las entradas

lunes, 25 de junio de 2012

Creo Customer: Design Collaboration with Vendors


Starting with their world class mountain bike frame, Santa Cruz uses over fifty vendors to manufacture a near to perfect bike – headsets from Sram and Fox, bottom brackets by Shimano, Maverick hubs, Avid brakes, Boxxer mounts, and the list goes on. Last July, we brought you Santa Cruz Bicycles and their journey toward suspension nirvana. Using Creo Parametric, Santa Cruz made multiple iterations of theirActual Pivot Point technology to create a suspension system coveted by mountain bikers worldwide.
On projects like this, good vendor collaboration and communication is essential to building a bike that most cyclists will want buried with them when they die.
There are a lot of hands in the mix when it comes to creating a top notch human-powered machine. Each of these companies is passionate about their specific component, constantly updating and recreating their piece of the puzzle in the quest for the lighter, stronger, and faster ride. Consequently, parts change, like the size of the headset or the size of the bearings for the crank set that affect the bike specifications.
As Joe Graney, engineer for Santa Cruz says, “If you don’t have the right specifications on your frames, then you can’t make the parts fit. So, yeah, there’s a lot of interaction with our vendors and what would work and make it better and easier to implement.”
Santa Cruz and their vendors are often friends. They ride together, compare, change, and recreate. In this episode of the Product Design Show, Vince and Allison show how Santa Cruz Bicycles used Creo once again to work with a vendor and improve the design on their carbon frame bikes.

martes, 10 de abril de 2012

Cool Tools for Design Collaboration


There’s much talk about how Social Media is coming at the enterprise like a tidal wave that inevitably must be ridden. The intellectual protectionism of the past is being replaced with openness and exploration amongst peers and a wider team. This doesn’t mean, however, that intellectual property is up for grabs. It means that companies are mirroring the new social norm and capitalizing on it with project management systems that can ride with – instead of disrupt – the flow of product design.
The next generation of users is actively pursuing tools that can bring teams together to foster open discussion, share ideas, and contribute to the project. That’s not an engineering change – that’s a social shift.
As Al Dean of Develop 3D says, “The next generation has dramatically different expectations in terms of how they communicate with both their peers and seniors. It’s nothing to do engineering or design but all across the board.”
Today’s software is beginning to mimic our web-like thought process in creating a product. Tools like Microsoft SharepointPTC Windchill, and IBM LotusNotes are software that benefit open collaboration and clarify ideas. The software resides firmly behind a firewall and closed to the outside world, so that ideas can flow freely and securely between all levels of business.
Previously, the Product Design Show looked at the advantages of open communication with vendors. Products like Creo View Express let engineers and vendors communicate in wordand picture – sending 3D models that still protect intellectual property. Check out this episode of the Product Design Show to learn more about how social media and 3D collaboration tools work together.

miércoles, 7 de marzo de 2012

Creo Customer: Design Collaboration with Vendors

Starting with their world class mountain bike frame, Santa Cruz uses over fifty vendors to manufacture a near to perfect bike – headsets from Sram and Fox, bottom brackets by Shimano, Maverick hubs, Avid brakes, Boxxer mounts, and the list goes on. Last July, we brought you Santa Cruz Bicycles and their journey toward suspension nirvana. Using Creo Parametric, Santa Cruz made multiple iterations of theirActual Pivot Point technology to create a suspension system coveted by mountain bikers worldwide.
On projects like this, good vendor collaboration and communication is essential to building a bike that most cyclists will want buried with them when they die.
There are a lot of hands in the mix when it comes to creating a top notch human-powered machine. Each of these companies is passionate about their specific component, constantly updating and recreating their piece of the puzzle in the quest for the lighter, stronger, and faster ride. Consequently, parts change, like the size of the headset or the size of the bearings for the crank set that affect the bike specifications.
As Joe Graney, engineer for Santa Cruz says, “If you don’t have the right specifications on your frames, then you can’t make the parts fit. So, yeah, there’s a lot of interaction with our vendors and what would work and make it better and easier to implement.”
Santa Cruz and their vendors are often friends. They ride together, compare, change, and recreate. In this episode of the Product Design Show, Vince and Allison show how Santa Cruz Bicycles used Creo once again to work with a vendor and improve the design on their carbon frame bikes.

jueves, 29 de diciembre de 2011

4 Reasons to Keep Engineering in a Box


Photo from flickr.com/photos/29311691@N05/
To get the most out of your design process, it is important to optimize how your company utilizes its engineering staff. As a former engineer in the HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) world I have four tips on how to (or how not to…) “maximize” your engineers’ time while improving the skills of your workers and generating additional revenue streams.
#1: Eliminating collaboration reduces time spent in meetings. To reduce unnecessary “discussion” about designs, innovative managers can apply a variety of techniques. One of my favorite techniques is to implement different design tools, none of which work together, throughout the team. This way, you not only prevent designers from collaborating, in the off-chance an outsider does manage to penetrate the design process, contamination is limited to a single system.
Fact: The best way to encourage a healthy design process is to ensure that there are open lines of communication within the design group. Hand-offs should be smooth, not “thrown over the wall.” And standardization on common platforms and programs is a proven way to help to promote collaboration, shorten time to market and improve quality.
#2: Avoiding customer feedback shortens design cycles. One surefire way to reduce your time to market is staying focused… staying focused and not letting people with opinions, like customers for example, distract you. Who do they think they are anyways?
Fact: Getting customer feedback throughout the design process saves you time and money. Yes, it costs money to get customer feedback. Yes, it takes time to collect and analyze customer feedback. But a product with a slightly longer time to market that hits the mark is infinitely more profitable than one that doesn’t sell. Need another reason? Making changes in the design cycle is MUCH cheaper than trying to make changes after the product is in production.
#3: Ignoring problems promotes problem solving skills. Sure the manufacturing guys might find ways to improve the design for production, but there’s no need to change the original design. When you are ready to release the next version, manufacturing will probably remember what they did last time…
Fact: Pushing manufacturing changes back to design, essentially marrying the eBOM and mBOM, ensures that your next version will be that much better. And in cases where parts are used across multiple assemblies, these changes create cascading efficiencies. Creating bridges between design and manufacturing also grows the skills of your design team, showing them what does and does not work in production.
#4: Faulty parts generate service revenues. Aftermarket Service, or Service Life Cycle Management, can be a profitable business, especially when you have parts that constantly break. One way to ensure that this business is not threatened is to make sure that no one replaces the faulty parts with ones that actually last.
Fact: Poor quality is a proven way to lose customers. By making sure that service informs engineering of faulty parts, this problem can be addressed, increasing both the quality of your product and the satisfaction of your customers.
There you have it, four guaranteed ways to “improve” your design process through engineering isolation. But seriously, as you look at the roles that various groups play, or could play, in your design process remember that the designs we engineers create are only as good as the information we have.
Extending design beyond engineering, with collaboration and active downstream feedback, can only help to improve your end results.

viernes, 30 de septiembre de 2011

Design News: Putting a New Face on CAD Interoperability


Read full article here

martes, 13 de septiembre de 2011

Overcoming the Challenges of Globalized Product Development


Product development in nearly every industry is now a globally collaborative activity with skilled engineering teams dispersed geographically developing products in a collaborative manner. Factors driving this trend include: growing competitive pressures, the availability of strong talent overseas, better digital collaboration and communication tools, and emergence of new growing markets overseas.

Global manufacturers must develop and implement best practices that enable them to deploy coordinated product development strategies that must span timelines, language barriers and global borders. The touted benefits of globalized product development include greater engineering efficiency as a result of lower-cost resources; access to international technical expertise; new global markets for products; and more flexible resource allocation through outsourcing. Transitioning existing processes and practices, however, leads to a host of strategic and tactical issues that companies must overcome before successfully deploying globalized product development (GPD). Let’s take a look at a few of these issues:

Intellectual property (IP). Sharing valuable product data, designs and technologies outside the company makes protecting IP more challenging. Companies must define products and processes in a modular structure to help protect IP.

Process methodology. Companies must develop a methodology to delegate tasks to different global centers. When a remote location is involved in work that is part of a larger task, there must be a process in place that breaks down the task into clear steps, determines what steps are done by each center, then reconfigures the process to enable the necessary handoffs, reviews and approvals.

Product modularity. Often complete subsystems or components are outsourced to design teams at another location. Modular product architectures can facilitate the global coordination of these products. Clearly defined interfaces between modules facilitate their separate development and eventual integration into the final product.

Data integrity. Data in a global organization must be distributed between multiple, often geographically dispersed locations. When each location uses their own unique tools and databases, data availability, accessibility, and auditability all become key issues. In order to maintain data integrity throughout the global organization, best practices for both data and file management must be established. In addition, one design system or database must be recognized as the parent system and all users need to understand the impact of changes they make to the source data.

Organizational change management. Some of the most challenging issues in GPD are those involving individuals’ roles, behaviors and the new skills required of them. Careful planning, training and education should all be allocated for those individuals who will play critical roles in making GPD work.

Overcoming the Challenges

The transition to GPD must incorporate new ways to collaborate among teams and individuals across times zones, languages, cultures and companies, and these differences must be taken into account from the outset. Manufacturers must take a systematic approach that addresses all three major components of GPD: process, people, and technology.

A key enabler to success in GPD seems to hinge on standardization, in both tools and processes. Design teams in lower-cost regions might not have the expertise on or access to the same level of high-end design tools used in the U.S. and other high-cost regions. Key management must be able to establish standardized product development tools with which new products are designed as well as standardized and documented processes. Standardizing processes and tools from the outset of GPD efforts helps drive compliance and effective methodology.

Product lifecycle management (PLM) systems can help manufacturers establish open and secure digital environments for product development that protects IP and enables all distributed design teams to access the most up-to-date design data. PLM systems also enable manufacturers to keep track of all of the processes and tasks—regardless of what group is doing them or where they are—at each state of the product development cycle as well as tracking and managing engineering changes so everyone can see the impact of changes. With the right standardized tools and processes in place, manufacturers can drive greater efficiencies, growth and innovation through successful GPD.

Is your company involved with GPD and if so,
what are some of the challenges it faces?

lunes, 12 de septiembre de 2011

Design News: Putting a New Face on CAD Interoperability


Read full article here